Review of: Web
Jon MARCUM
12/29/2021
Verified Buyer
Very good content on programming in javascript.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
W. David Bruce, Ph.D., P.E.
04/20/2020
Verified Buyer
This is a good, challenging course. The practical exercises were beneficial, and the "References" at the end provide useful, supplemental information.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
Richard Sita
02/21/2020
Verified Buyer
Well organized and well presented
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
rodney
12/29/2019
Verified Buyer
very good. looking forward to trying what i've learned.
1 of 1 customers found this helpful.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
Pascal Hayes
11/19/2019
Verified Buyer
Course was informative... Now I need to put it into practice in some way.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
John Sides, Jr. PE QCP CEM NEBB_CP
01/02/2019
Verified Buyer
Excellent review of scripting and handling of more complex functions and logic.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
James Mitchell
12/02/2018
Verified Buyer
Excellent Course!
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
james stewart
08/01/2018
Verified Buyer
very good
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
Laurence Campbell
06/07/2018
Verified Buyer
This has been an informative series, it has demystify
website for me.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
The correct answer for exam question. . . is (a), not (c) as given in the exam results. I answered correctly, but was marked wrong. This needs to be fixed.
Otherwise, this was an OK course.
You missed the word NOT in the question. It now appears in all caps, bold and underlined.
Portions of the review have been removed because they disclosed the answer to a question.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
Great class. Good foundation of information.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
JL
02/11/2017
Verified Buyer
The entire web-based programming series is well written and builds upon each course. I took all three and highly recommend them. The only reason I am not giving this particular course five stars is because the test needs to be reviewed. In particular, three questions had problems. One was different than the practice test. In another, all choices were incorrect, and in a third, the explanation in the test is right but the answer itself is wrong. If this is fixed, this course would rate 5 stars.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
Wayne Allgood
12/31/2016
Verified Buyer
This was more difficult than the other two courses. Since I don't really have any programming experience, I got confused in correlating the examples in the text with the questions on the test. I also felt that the answers to two of test questions were not correct ( questions 4 and 14). I believe question 4 should have been .... In question 14 I do not understand how the date was arrived. The date was given as ...
A portion of the review was omitted because it addressed specific test questions and answers.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
I have taken all three courses. They are very good courses, but there are some typos. The exam for section three needs reviewing. Specifically, question 4) ...
A portion of the review was omitted because it addressed specific test questions and answers.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
Hill Wright
12/20/2016
Verified Buyer
This is an extensive coverage of the basics of Web based programming. I appreciate how much effort the author took to develop a course that has value. Either I just do not understand something or the answer given to question #4 is incorrect? One of the other answers seemed incorrect until I went back and reviewed it again. Then I figured out that I was a victim of previous experience with programming! Thanks for a fine course. Hope you develop more!
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
I did not agree with 2 of the correct answers. Please review test question 4...[and]
Test question 14 ...
A portion of the review was omitted because it addressed specific test questions and answers.
Was this helpful?
192-Web-Based Programming For Engineers - Part 3
George Ojdrovich
11/08/2016
Verified Buyer
This review is for all 3 parts of Web Based Programming.
Very well written and very useful courses to get an intense but quick start to HTML and Javascript. I was actually surprised at how much value I received here as I wasn't really expecting much. Very good courses.
A portion of the review was omitted because it addressed specific test questions and answers.
Was this helpful?
Web Based Programming for Engineers Part 3
Steven Greenbaum
05/19/2016
Verified Buyer
I disagree with the answer to #14. ...
I disagree with the ans to #22 . ...
We do not publish review comments that discuss the correct answers to test questions.
Was this helpful?
192 Web-based programming for Engineers-Part3
Steve Greguske
04/24/2016
Hi,
Please check questions 4 and 14 on the exam as they do not agree with the lesson.
Thanks!
Steve
Was this helpful?
Lots of good examples, Problems with the test answers
Bruce Patterson
12/11/2015
Verified Buyer
I disagree with the answer on problem 4... I also disagree with the test results on number 14 ...
Portions of the review were deleted because they reveal the answers to test questions.
Was this helpful?
Excellent Continuation of HTML5 Course; quiz problems
The course content is superb. It presents essential information in a direct fashion with good examples. Quiz question 14 appears to have a typo. Some of the quiz questions were tricky.
Was this helpful?
(no title provided)
This is a difficult course for those without a background in DSP or the math involved.
Was this helpful?